Heteronormativity Kritik Essay Example for Free

Heteronormativity Kritik EssayThis chapter is about awaken, but not the sex that people already have clarity about. Outer plaza as a human, political plain is organized around sex, but a sex that is tacitly located, and rarely spoken, in official discourse. The poli tics of outside space geographic expedition, militarization and commercialization as they are conceived of and practiced in the US, embody a trait between public and private (and appropriate deportments, meanings and identities therein) highly dependent upon heteronormative hierarchies of property and propriety. The central aim of this chapter is to arrangement how US outside space discourse, an imperial discourse of technological, military and commercial superiority, configutes and prescribes success and successful behaviour in the politics of outside space in particularly sex activityed forms. US space discourse is, I argue, predicated on a heteronormative discourse of conquering that reproduces the dom inance of heterosexual masculinity(ies), and which hierarchically orders the construction of other (subordinate) sexual activity identities.Reading the politics of outer space as heteronormative suggests that the discourses through which space exists consist of institutions, structures of understanding, practical orientations and regulatory practices organized and privileged around heterosexuality. As a particularly dominant discursive arrangement of outer space politics, US space discourse (re)produces meaning through sexual activityed assumptions of exploration, colonization, economic endeavour and military conquest that are deeply gendered whilst presented as universal and neutral.US space discourse, which dominates the contemporary global politics of outer space, is thus formed from and upon institutions, structures of understanding, and practical orientations that privilege and normalize heterosexualiry as universal. As such, the hegemonic discursive rationalizations of space exploration and conquest ,re)produce both heterosexuality as unmarked (that is, thoroughly normal ized) and the heterosexual imperatives that constitute fitted space-able people, practices and behaviours.As the introduction to this volume highlights, the exploration and utilization of outer space can thus far-off be held up as a mirror of, rather than a challenge to, existent, terrestrially-bound, political patterns, behaviours and impulses. The stark naked possibilities for human progress that the application and development of space technologies dares us to make are grounded only in the strategy obsessed (be it commercially, militarily or otherwise) realities of contemporary global politics.Outer space is a conceptual, political and material space, a place for collisions and collusions (literally and metaphorically) between objects, ideas, identities and discourses. Outer space, like international relations, is a global space always socially and locally embedded. There is noth ing out there about outer space. It exists because of us, not in spite of us, and it is this that means that it only makes sense in social terms, that is, in relation to our sustain constructions of identity and social location.In this chapter, outer space is the problematic to which I apply a gender analysis an arena wherein past, current and future policy-making is embedded in relation to certain performances of spring and reconfigurations of identity that are always, and not incidentally, gendered. Effective and appropriate behaviour in the politics of ourer space is configure and prescribed in particularly gendered forms, with heteronormative gender regulations endowing outer spaces hierarchies of technologically superior, conquesting performance with theif everyday power.It is through gender that US techno-strategic and astro-political discourse has been able to (re)produce outer space as a heterosexualized, masculinized realm. Heteronormativity K 1NC 2. The drive to annex s pace precludes queer identities and concretizes sexual difference. This reinforces heterosexism and turns women into commodities. Casper and Moore 95 (Monica J. , Ph. D in sociology from the University of California, San Francisco, feminist scholar and researcher on reproductive justice. Lisa Jean, Ph. D in sociology from the University